<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wes President&#8217;s NYT Op-ed Hypocritical?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inthecac.com/2012/09/09/wes-presidents-nyt-op-ed-hypocritical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inthecac.com/2012/09/09/wes-presidents-nyt-op-ed-hypocritical/</link>
	<description>11 Schools, One &#039;Cac</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnwesley</title>
		<link>http://inthecac.com/2012/09/09/wes-presidents-nyt-op-ed-hypocritical/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>johnwesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecac.com/?p=2796#comment-3686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OP paraphrases an anonymous Wesleyan student as saying, &quot;that by encouraging an alternative (three year) path to their degree, Roth is already sorting low-income students in the same way his article decries&quot;

Actually, the three-year degree at Wesleyan isn&#039;t designed for low-income students (although some may find it advantageous.)  Wesleyan students from low-income families making &lt;$40k qualify for no-loan financial aid and will be pretty generously funded even under the new &quot;need-aware&quot; policy starting with next year&#039;s freshman class.

The three-year degree program, as President Roth has made clear on many occasions, is an attempt to help middle-class families - those in the $90k to $150k category - who may be looking for ways to cut college costs. It isn&#039;t going to be everyone&#039;s cup of tea; but, it is available and, is one of the most effective ways currently out there for helping the &quot;missing middle&quot; compete with families who are so poor that they qualify for generous financial aid and with families that are so wealthy that they can afford full-tuition and then some. They will be taking the same number of courses and have the same opportunities for pursuing &quot;the life of the mind&quot; during the school year as every other Wesleyan student.  They&#039;ll just be graduating sooner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OP paraphrases an anonymous Wesleyan student as saying, &#8220;that by encouraging an alternative (three year) path to their degree, Roth is already sorting low-income students in the same way his article decries&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, the three-year degree at Wesleyan isn&#8217;t designed for low-income students (although some may find it advantageous.)  Wesleyan students from low-income families making &lt;$40k qualify for no-loan financial aid and will be pretty generously funded even under the new &quot;need-aware&quot; policy starting with next year&#039;s freshman class.</p>
<p>The three-year degree program, as President Roth has made clear on many occasions, is an attempt to help middle-class families &#8211; those in the $90k to $150k category &#8211; who may be looking for ways to cut college costs. It isn&#039;t going to be everyone&#039;s cup of tea; but, it is available and, is one of the most effective ways currently out there for helping the &quot;missing middle&quot; compete with families who are so poor that they qualify for generous financial aid and with families that are so wealthy that they can afford full-tuition and then some. They will be taking the same number of courses and have the same opportunities for pursuing &quot;the life of the mind&quot; during the school year as every other Wesleyan student.  They&#039;ll just be graduating sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
